Nicholas Carr vs Steven Pinker Essay

in that location is no doubt about it that in todays multiplication the net income is hotshot of the beat phenomenal creations invented. By simply having a computer, cell phone, tablet, ect, anyone and everyone spate access the Internet. But can this decent yet simple creation have a drastic effect on how the new generation operates today? The entire world is rapidly becoming obsessed everywhere you look youre margin to see nearthing related to the Internet. Search engines, texting, twittering, blogging to name a few.We have all heard of at to the lowest degree one of those internet friendly applications. But can those applications plough too friendly to the point where they ar a distraction to the young mind? Can those applications hinder how the human brain functions? There be numerous arguments, views and statements regarding such an important question. Two writers that I researched share their opinions and views based off of how the internet has modify another(pren ominal)s intelligence today. These two writers go by the name of Nicholas Carr and Steven Pinker.Without having any knowledge of what the words are about one only needs to read there titles to distinguish the differences between the two. Where as Nicholas Carrs article is titled, Does the Internet Make You Dumber? Steven Pinkers article is titled, Mind over Mass Media. Both writers have completely antithetical types of titles but one can assume that they are responding to the same subject. After thoroughly reading both articles, Nicholas Carr and Steven Pinker have completely different views when it comes down to how the internet influences others.Firstly, Nicholas Carr addresses heavily how in fact the internet does pull ahead you dumber. All throughout the article he gives examples of studies aimed at showing how the internet doesnt positively tin to the brain at all. As stated from the article Nicholas Carr explains how People who read text studded with links, get the pictu re less than those who read traditional linear text. How, people who watch busy multimedia presentation concoct less than those who take in information in a much sedate and focused stylus.All of which are pretty apparent that the effect that the internet has on the mind is quite drastic. On the other hand, Steven Pinkers article strongly disagrees at the fact that the internet affects the human brain. His defensive points mainly explain how without the internet a lot of today discoveries and new inventions wouldnt be possible. Also he defends the fact that distraction or addiction is not a new phenomenon. Regardless of whether the internet is a popular utility or not, distraction would still be an occurring issue.It is quoted If electronic media were hazardous to intelligence, the quality of skill would be plummeting. Also, Yes the constant arrival of information packets can be distracting or addictive, especially to people with charge deficit disorder. But distraction is not a new phenomenon. The solution is not to bemoan engineering science but to develop strategies of egotism-control as we do with every other temptation in life. Steven Pinker is trying to get the reader to understand that the internet doesnt essentially make you dumber but it does hinge at ones attention span.Outside of the internet distractions are common everywhere. One can become distracted by their job, parents, work, internet, ect. Because of these interruptions Steven Pinkers makes it known that all distractions require self-control. If one doesnt have self control over an issue they will become addicted. Lastly my research wasnt over. It wouldnt be right if I didnt get a third opinion to help provide some extra study. A third writer that I came across was a woman named Sherry Turkle.Sherry Turkle has written a popular novel titled Alone Together. In the novel Alone Together write Sherry Turkle explains a third completely different concern on how technology affects the ave rage American. This concern is in regards to how individuals will end up alone together because technology has distanced face to face relationships. That society expects more from technology and less from each other. Over the years Sherry Turkle has examined how technology has jeopardized the true meaning of hands on communication.Although she does not mention how the internet may interfere with learning or brain capabilities she does still presents other exceptionally important factors. In conclusion, in comparison of the two primary articles that I researched I would in conclusion have to agree with the Nicholas Carr piece. I feel as if the Nicholas Carr piece will convince more people. His article compared to Steven Pinkers has a lot of legitimate studies and facts.His studies included one conducted at Cornell University, where they conducted the laptop experience, which compared the effect of students who canvass utilizing the traditional method of the depository library and t hose who studied using the laptop for research, with the conclusion that those who studied using the library grades were higher studies from Stanford where they conducted a multi-tasking trial, also, studies from the University of California in San Francisco where they conducted a brain experiment.Where, Steven Pinkers article comes off as an opinion piece with little to no background information or supporting references. I would motivation to believe that the mind is in fact over mass media but Steven Pinkers article doesnt defend his title strongly at all. Thus, leaving me with the conclusion that the internet is a major distraction, can hinder how I use my brain properly, and can jeopardize my in person communication skills that I have available.